stepfordgoth

    2020 is the funniest fucking time to be alive

    ikeamalmdressers

    When the drugs have fried your brain so bad that you can’t even tell the difference between being anti-establishment in a regressive way vs a preogresive way.

    feminismisahatemovement

    ▲ When the ideological indoctrination is so complete, you sincerely believe race wars, riots and looting, divisive identity politics, language policing and censorship of all dissenting opinions are ‘progressive’.

    r0s3bu5h

    yall Cannot tell me sex-based oppression doesnt exist; my dad has to go into work tomorrow while im at home, and he accidentally booked a repairman for our roof on the same day, and so i have to Hide In My Room while he works on the roof bc ill be home alone with no one around to hear me scream.

    if i were a boy i would be able to exist in my own home normally no matter what, but bc im a girl im at risk, all the time, from all directions.

    so, yes, women are still oppressed, and yes feminism is still extremely relevant to every female

    thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound

    All you are saying here is that you've bought into the feminist lie that females are more at risk of assault than males. Any compilation of violent crime statistics that breaks down by victim's sex makes it very clear that males are overall at far greater risk.

    Assumptions that don't line up with reality don't justify the existence of the ideology that pushes them; quite the opposite.

    feminismisahatemovement

    So shes oppressed because she views every second human being who has ever lived as a predatory criminal?

    Hmmm.

    There ought to be a “swear jar”-type rule where, every time a feminist makes a generalization about ‘men’ they have to stand up in front of all their friends and read it out aloud, but putting the word “black” in front of the word “man”, just to see how it is then received, and then maybe have some quiet time to reflect on what kind of ugly message they are putting out into the world.

    pooja-whatisthisbehaviour

    Ironic how people who insult feminists by calling us ‘feminazis’ are the same people who support actual nazis

    thatsyouthatshowdumbyousound

    "just say you don't know what nazism is and go"

    OP used this tag to describe others, for this post.

    Now that is irony.

    feminismisahatemovement

    It’s official: the word “Nazi” no longer means anything anymore except “a person who disagrees with me”.

    Can’t wait for the dictionary to change the definition,

    A society that aims for equality before liberty will end up with neither equality nor liberty. And a society that aims first for liberty will not end up with equality but it will end up with a closer approach to equality than any other kind of system that has ever been developed.

    Milton Friedman

    feminismisahatemovement

    Just your daily reminder that Woody Allen was found to be innocent twice by two seperate law investigations and Mia Farrow is a psychotic monster who physically and psychologically abused all her children.

    feminismisahatemovement
    image

    No.

    His girlfriend Mia Farrow, who he never lived with or married, had adopted a houseful of kids from around the world with her previous husband before they met. While they were together, Allen never had a hand in raising those children, or even spent a single night in the house they lived in. When one of those kids, Soon-Yi, was 21 years old, they began spending more time together, fell in love, got married and are still happily married more than 25 years later.

    When Farrow found out he’d left her for this younger woman, she turned super, super, super-psycho and pulled out all the stops to get revenge, including coaching her 7-year old daughter (who towards the end of their relationship Allen had co-adopted) into telling a story that Allen had molested her. Two different police investigations into this concluded that the child had been coached by Farrow in order to get custody and that the allegations were unfounded, but the child still grew up hating her father and believing what her mother had brainwashed her into saying, along with her one biological child with Allen, Ronan, now a leader of the #MeToo movement.

    Both Soon-Yi and another of her children, Moses Farrow, have told of how Mia Farrow physically and psychologically abused all the children in her care - three of whom ended up dying young, two from suicide, one from AIDS.
    (
    Please read that link).

    Mia Farrow is a monster who, directly because of the #MeToo movement, gets to not only hide in plain sight, she gets to portray herself as a victim, a poor helpless woman who must be believed, even as she destroys the lives of all around her.

    someoneintheshadow456

    Wait… so it’s not Woody “daughter fucker” Allen…

    It’s Mia “crazy ex wife” Farrow…

    hearts-kingdom

    Awfully convenient of you to leave out how Woody Allen had been in therapy for innapropriate behavior towards his adopted daughter Dylan Farrow, lost four legal court battles, and had his behavior towards Dylan deemed as grossly inappropriate by Judge Wilk. Oh, and your seemed to forget to include how evidence was also not deemed as reliable by Judge Wilk or the State Prosecutor and the fact that Woody changed his initial story. This is rather misleading given how you also chose to refrain from relaying the fact that the State Attorney confessed to them having enough evidence in regard to probable cause against Woody to press charges, yet decided not to due to his poor excuse of not wanting to harm “the fragility of the ‘child victim’” in favor of allowing a pedophile to walk free.

    Rich people frequently get away with crimes regardless of their gender due to being able to afford resources for legal sources that give them an advantage, although you seem to be making this about a gender thing given your blog title while doing so at the cost of an abuse victim.

    Oh, and if you actually bother looking at the resource I provided in the underlined link then you’ll find that a male judge- who understands this case much better than you or me- says, “that there is ‘no credible evidence to support Mr. Allen’s contention that Ms. Farrow coached Dylan or that Ms. Farrow acted upon a desire for revenge against him for seducing Soon-Yi.’”

    Mia Farrow was abusive and Woody Allen was a pedophile. Both were awful people. You don’t need to use a victim like Dylan Farrow and the movement she’s found refuge in as a scapegoat to push your own agenda. This would have been a worthwhile post if it was just bring attention to Mia’s abuse without bootlicking a pedophile to do so. Instead, you’ve spread misleading information about a pedophile.

    I don’t doubt Moses Farrow was abused by Mia in the least, but the source also brings attention to how Dylan’s story aligns with three other peoples— not just Mia’s. Moses likely wasn’t present during the assault, so he can’t say she wasn’t assaulted anymore than Dylan can say he wasn’t abused. Particularly when there’s more than her and her mother coming forward about this when his claims discrediting her rely on insisting this was a plot devised by the mother with the daughter without bringing attention to these other witnesses. I’m not trying to call out Moses here he’s a victim of trauma and what he wants to say on his own experience is valid but discrediting others trauma is not when his evidence lacks comparatively.

    You’re literally holding genders to different standards by crying out about how Woody Allen was innocent because all we’ve heard are allegations without him actually being jailed while acting as though the allegations against Mia should be taken more seriously. Both allegations should be taken seriously and in claiming otherwise you’re failing to follow your own so-called values regarding men and women being held to an equal standards; your username seems to suggest you claim you’re against women holding men up to higher standards despite feminism being about equality, and then you turn around and do this which is hypocritical in itself given how you just switch roles in this sense.

    Maybe everyone reblogging this should actually do their research and consider things critically for more than a second before reblogging B.S. under the assumption it’s true just because someone holds societal beliefs that aligns with your own. This isn’t a callout post please just educate yourselves before believing things on a whim. Asking y’all to consider things critically isn’t an insult it’s a life skill lmfao. Please reblog this version instead so misleading facts that refrain from relaying significant facts isn’t spread.

    feminismisahatemovement

    Well, it’s a big matter to slog through, so I was just hoping anyone reading the above nonsense would realize how obviously flawed it is - first off by using a clickbaiting tabloid as its only source, instead of firsthand testimony or court records or whatever. The person who posted it is a loon whose next post spammed every single person who had reblogged it with tags to try get attention, so I blocked her.

    Here’s what’s funny: because she has been brainwashed into the ‘YOU MUST BELIEVE THE VICTIM” #MeToo cult mentality, she is accepting that Mia Farrow is an abusive monster and Moses Farrow is telling the truth in his descriptions of her abusive, vengeful and manipulative behaviour against all her children (and, in Moses’ account, Woody Allen himself ) and yet she still believes Mia Farrow’s claim that Allen is a paedophile. She believes these two things are equally true, that each has equal weight, that the words of the person known to have abused and manipulated, and to have reason to lie about the other person, should be believed as much as the person she is attacking, that both being true is the most likely truth of the matter. That’s just plain dumb.

    There’s so much that can be said about Farrow and the inconsistencies of her claims, but I don’t want to write a novel here, and everything I would want to say has been said much better by her son Moses, whose detailed account the above blogger seems not to have read or at least let enter her skull and bother her brain.

    Dylan’s account claims that she was molested in the attic of Mia Farrow’s house with a model train running around the tracks around them while Woody Allen promised to take her (a 7 year old) to Paris to act in his next movie(??!)

    But as Moses explains on his website, in Mia Farrow’s house there was no attic, there was no trainset in the house and certainly not somewhere up in the ceiling, and hence it was impossible there could have been any abuse taking place there. And the day it was supposed to have happened the house was full of people, including Moses, who’d been told by Farrow to keep an eye on Allen because he’d started seeing Soon-Yi, and custody proceedings over Dylan had begun: Why would Woody Allen, who has never had any other accusations of impropriety, rape, child abuse, etc. at any point in his whole life, decide on THIS day, of ALL days, in a hostile setting, in the middle of a custody battle, surrounded by people, to suddenly go for broke and try his hand at a long, sustained bout of paedophilia?  Surely any reasonable person would have to conclude to do so, in an attic that didn’t exist, with a toy train set in his back pocket he decided to take out and lay down for the occasion, would be utter insanity.

    But of course he didn’t: this was all a fantasy planted into Dylan’s head by Farrow repeatedly telling her to say these things in order to get sole custody of the child, something that the Yale–New Haven Child Sexual Abuse Clinic whom the police hired to investigate the matter also concluded:

    “It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen. Further, we believe that Dylan’s statements on videotape and her statements to us during our evaluation do not refer to actual events that occurred to her on August 4, 1992.. In developing our opinion, we considered three hypotheses to explain Dylan’s statements. First, that Dylan’s statements were true and that Mr. Allen had sexually abused her; second, that Dylan’s statements were not true but were made up by an emotionally vulnerable child who was caught up in a disturbed family and who was responding to the stresses in the family; and third, that Dylan was coached or influenced by her mother, Ms. Farrow. While we can conclude that Dylan was not sexually abused, we cannot be definitive about whether the second formulation by itself or the third formulation by itself is true. We believe that it is more likely that a combination of these two formulations best explain Dylan’s allegations of sexual abuse.”

    eeveelutionsforequality

    some quotes from the wiki article on this (which is obviously sourced)

    “The Connecticut State’s Attorney investigated the allegation but did not press charges, the Connecticut State Police referred Dylan to the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of Yale–New Haven Hospital, which concluded that Allen had not sexually abused Dylan, and the New York Department of Social Services found "no credible evidence” to support the allegation.“

    "In response to the allegation, Allen sued Farrow for sole custody of Dylan, Satchel and Moses. He lost the case in June 1993, though the judge agreed that the allegation of sexual abuse had not been proven.”

    “Dylan has repeated the allegation several times as an adult, although with modifications of Mia’s 1992 narrative.”

    “Mia is accused of child abuse by two of her children, Moses and Soon-Yi, who also accuse her of false allegations and of "brainwashing” Dylan. In a 2018 letter, Moses, who felt in charge of carefully watching Dylan the weekend she was allegedly molested and who was 14 at the time, explains in detail why he believes the allegation is false and describes his forced support of Mia as the biggest mistake of his life.“

    "In December 1987 Farrow gave birth to Allen’s biological son, Satchel (later known as Ronan Farrow). Farrow wanted to adopt another child in 1991; Allen said he would not take "a lousy attitude toward it” so long as she agreed to his adoption of Dylan and Moses, and in October that year she adopted another Vietnamese child.“

    "The family psychologist, Dr. Susan Coates, witnessed some of Allen’s behavior and testified during the custody trial in 1993 that she saw it not as sexual but as "inappropriately intense because it excluded everybody else”. Allen said later that he had paid Dylan extra attention to compensate for the time Farrow was spending with the newborn Satchel. According to Maureen Orth, Allen agreed in 1990 to discuss the issue in therapy sessions; but at the trial Coates said that Allen was not in therapy with her and that both parents were part of the children’s therapy. Allen wanted to improve as a father, but was not in therapy for inappropriate behavior with Dylan or for any other problems.“

    "Present in the house once Farrow had left were Dylan; Satchel; Farrow’s babysitter, Kristie Groteke; the children’s French tutor, Sophie Berge; Farrow’s friend’s three children; and Farrow’s friend’s babysitter, Alison Strickland. When Farrow left the house Moses was, according to her, "off by himself taking a walk”. Moses claims he was in the house when Allen arrived. The day after the visit, Strickland told her employer that she had seen Allen kneel on the floor in front of Dylan, then aged seven, with his face in her lap turned toward Dylan’s body; she testified to that effect during the custody trial. (The judge, after hearing Strickland’s testimony, did not believe that she was describing any kind of abuse or inappropriate behavior.)“

    "According to the expert Farrow hired, Farrow had videotaped Dylan answering her questions before the second visit to the pediatrician, and Dylan had made the allegation of abuse "in fits and starts”, and in a way that “set a tone for a child about how to answer”, and Dylan told Farrow that she had been with Allen in the attic and that he had touched her private parts. The following day, they returned to see Kavirajan, and Dylan repeated the allegation. Kavirajan then informed authorities, although he said he found no physical evidence of sexual molestation. Kavirajan later told an interviewer that he was “required by state law” to report any allegations of child abuse.“

    "On August 18 Allen held a news conference at the Plaza Hotel. Calling the molestation allegation "an unconscionable and gruesomely damaging manipulation of innocent children for vindictive and self-serving motives,” he alleged that, during a meeting on August 13, Farrow’s lawyers had demanded between $5 million and $8 million in hush money. Dershowitz responded that the lawyers had suggested Allen pay a lump sum in child support, rather than a monthly one, to reduce Allen’s interaction with Farrow. It would be $17,000 a month until each child reach the age of 21, $900,000 for college tuition and $2,500,000 for Farrow herself as compensation for her loss of income for the next ten years. Allen’s lawyers declared that Farrow’s proposal was that in exchange for the money she would drop the charges of sexual abuse.“

    "The judicial investigation concluded that the sexual relationship between Soon Yi and Allen began in December 1991. Allen denied Dylan’s allegations that she had witnessed a sexual relationship between him and Previn in the summer of 1991, insisting that their relationship didn’t begin until December.”

    “The clinic’s professionals met with the police and Maco for preliminary information. Between September 18 and November 13 they conducted nine separate interviews with Dylan and her mother. On October 14 they interviewed Groteke, and between November 17 and January 7 they had three interviews with Allen. Finally, they met with Farrow to review the recording she had made of Dylan between August 5 and 6. Berge, the other nanny present on August 4, was also interviewed, as were the two psychotherapists treating the children, Coates and Nancy Schultz. The Child Sexual Abuse Clinic medical director, Dr. John M. Leventhal, signed the team’s report while Dylan was interviewed by the social workers. Completed in March 1993, the report concluded: "It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen.”“

    "The social workers met Dylan in Yale New Haven every Friday for an hour or so. Groteke was interviewed for three hours. Maureen Orth stated that its conclusion was based, in part, on the view that Dylan had difficulty telling a consistent story and suffered from "thought disturbances.” According to the report, the inconsistencies in Dylan’s statements, the lack of spontaneity, and the impression of repeating something learned were the main reason for the conclusions. The report also stressed that Dylan felt that she had to solve her mother’s problems, and indicated that the relationship between Farrow, Dylan and Satchel was very disturbed and required immediate intensive psychotherapy.“

    "Groteke, Farrow’s babysitter, testified in April that for about 15–20 minutes on the afternoon in question, she had not been able to find Dylan or Allen in the house; she had assumed they were outside with the other children. Allen said he had gone to the bathroom during the disputed period. Berge testified that she had noticed Dylan was wearing no underwear under her dress that day. Another Farrow nanny, Monica Thompson, who was not present in the house on that day, told Allen’s lawyers in two affidavits in February 1993 that she had felt pressured by Farrow to support the allegation. Thompson said that Groteke had also had reservations; according to Thompson, Groteke told her, days after the allegation was made, that she "did not have Dylan out of her sight for longer than five minutes. She did not remember Dylan being without her underwear.” Groteke acknowledged that she had had that conversation, but admitted only to telling Thompson that she did not remember having lost sight of Dylan. Thompson, who had been Dylan’s nanny since the girl was two months old, also said that the charges Farrow brought against Allen were “not true”. Mavis Smith, Farrow’s housekeeper of thirteen years, said she thought Allen was a good father and that she had never seen Allen doing anything sexual with Dylan or Satchel.“

    "Farrow and Allen hired Schultz in April 1991 because the child "lived in her own fantasy world”. Schultz testified that Dylan had become “absorbed in what the fantasy is [and] that it became real”. Neither Coates nor Schultz believed sexual abuse had occurred.“

    "In the official statement of decision of the prosecution, Maco acknowledged that even in the case of custody and with a more favorable standard of proof for the accusation than "beyond a reasonable doubt” it had been impossible to reach the conclusion that the abuse had occurred. He also said that the nature of the evidence was fertile ground for the defense and “would not have the same probative as it did in the New York Supreme Court custody case” and that he considered his duty “to avoid the unjustifiable risk of exposing a child to the rigors and uncertainties of a questionable prosecution".“

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Allen_sexual_abuse_allegation

    sorry that was long, but I tried to get the most important stuff and the most relevant to the above convos

    feminismisahatemovement

    Sorry about the length, but the above works as a good master post on the false accusations and hopefully ends the matter.

    feminismisahatemovement

    Just your daily reminder that Woody Allen was found to be innocent twice by two seperate law investigations and Mia Farrow is a psychotic monster who physically and psychologically abused all her children.

    feminismisahatemovement
    image

    No.

    His girlfriend Mia Farrow, who he never lived with or married, had adopted a houseful of kids from around the world with her previous husband before they met. While they were together, Allen never had a hand in raising those children, or even spent a single night in the house they lived in. When one of those kids, Soon-Yi, was 21 years old, they began spending more time together, fell in love, got married and are still happily married more than 25 years later.

    When Farrow found out he’d left her for this younger woman, she turned super, super, super-psycho and pulled out all the stops to get revenge, including coaching her 7-year old daughter (who towards the end of their relationship Allen had co-adopted) into telling a story that Allen had molested her. Two different police investigations into this concluded that the child had been coached by Farrow in order to get custody and that the allegations were unfounded, but the child still grew up hating her father and believing what her mother had brainwashed her into saying, along with her one biological child with Allen, Ronan, now a leader of the #MeToo movement.

    Both Soon-Yi and another of her children, Moses Farrow, have told of how Mia Farrow physically and psychologically abused all the children in her care - three of whom ended up dying young, two from suicide, one from AIDS.
    (
    Please read that link).

    Mia Farrow is a monster who, directly because of the #MeToo movement, gets to not only hide in plain sight, she gets to portray herself as a victim, a poor helpless woman who must be believed, even as she destroys the lives of all around her.

    someoneintheshadow456

    Wait… so it’s not Woody “daughter fucker” Allen…

    It’s Mia “crazy ex wife” Farrow…

    hearts-kingdom

    Awfully convenient of you to leave out how Woody Allen had been in therapy for innapropriate behavior towards his adopted daughter Dylan Farrow, lost four legal court battles, and had his behavior towards Dylan deemed as grossly inappropriate by Judge Wilk. Oh, and your seemed to forget to include how evidence was also not deemed as reliable by Judge Wilk or the State Prosecutor and the fact that Woody changed his initial story. This is rather misleading given how you also chose to refrain from relaying the fact that the State Attorney confessed to them having enough evidence in regard to probable cause against Woody to press charges, yet decided not to due to his poor excuse of not wanting to harm “the fragility of the ‘child victim’” in favor of allowing a pedophile to walk free.

    Rich people frequently get away with crimes regardless of their gender due to being able to afford resources for legal sources that give them an advantage, although you seem to be making this about a gender thing given your blog title while doing so at the cost of an abuse victim.

    Oh, and if you actually bother looking at the resource I provided in the underlined link then you’ll find that a male judge- who understands this case much better than you or me- says, “that there is ‘no credible evidence to support Mr. Allen’s contention that Ms. Farrow coached Dylan or that Ms. Farrow acted upon a desire for revenge against him for seducing Soon-Yi.’”

    Mia Farrow was abusive and Woody Allen was a pedophile. Both were awful people. You don’t need to use a victim like Dylan Farrow and the movement she’s found refuge in as a scapegoat to push your own agenda. This would have been a worthwhile post if it was just bring attention to Mia’s abuse without bootlicking a pedophile to do so. Instead, you’ve spread misleading information about a pedophile.

    I don’t doubt Moses Farrow was abused by Mia in the least, but the source also brings attention to how Dylan’s story aligns with three other peoples— not just Mia’s. Moses likely wasn’t present during the assault, so he can’t say she wasn’t assaulted anymore than Dylan can say he wasn’t abused. Particularly when there’s more than her and her mother coming forward about this when his claims discrediting her rely on insisting this was a plot devised by the mother with the daughter without bringing attention to these other witnesses. I’m not trying to call out Moses here he’s a victim of trauma and what he wants to say on his own experience is valid but discrediting others trauma is not when his evidence lacks comparatively.

    You’re literally holding genders to different standards by crying out about how Woody Allen was innocent because all we’ve heard are allegations without him actually being jailed while acting as though the allegations against Mia should be taken more seriously. Both allegations should be taken seriously and in claiming otherwise you’re failing to follow your own so-called values regarding men and women being held to an equal standards; your username seems to suggest you claim you’re against women holding men up to higher standards despite feminism being about equality, and then you turn around and do this which is hypocritical in itself given how you just switch roles in this sense.

    Maybe everyone reblogging this should actually do their research and consider things critically for more than a second before reblogging B.S. under the assumption it’s true just because someone holds societal beliefs that aligns with your own. This isn’t a callout post please just educate yourselves before believing things on a whim. Asking y’all to consider things critically isn’t an insult it’s a life skill lmfao. Please reblog this version instead so misleading facts that refrain from relaying significant facts isn’t spread.

    feminismisahatemovement

    Well, it’s a big matter to slog through, so I was just hoping anyone reading the above nonsense would realize how obviously flawed it is - first off by using a clickbaiting tabloid as its only source, instead of firsthand testimony or court records or whatever. The person who posted it is a loon whose next post spammed every single person who had reblogged it with tags to try get attention, so I blocked her.

    Here’s what’s funny: because she has been brainwashed into the ‘YOU MUST BELIEVE THE VICTIM” #MeToo cult mentality, she is accepting that Mia Farrow is a psychopathic monster and Moses Farrow is telling the truth in his descriptions of her abusive, vengeful and manipulative behaviour against all her children (and, in Moses’ account, Woody Allen himself ) and yet she still believes Mia Farrow’s claim that Allen is a paedophile. She believes these two things are equally true, that each has equal weight, that the words of the person known to have abused and manipulated, and to have reason to lie about the other person, should be believed as much as the person she is attacking, that both accounts being equally true is the most likely truth of the matter. That’s just idiotic.

    There’s so much that can be said about Farrow and the inconsistencies of her claims, but I don’t want to write a novel here, and everything I would want to say has been said much better by her son Moses, whose detailed account the above blogger seems not to have read or at least let enter her skull and bother her brain.

    Dylan’s account claims that she was molested in the attic of Mia Farrow’s house with a model train running around the tracks around them while Woody Allen promised to take her (a 7 year old!) to Paris to act in his next movie(??!)

    But as Moses explains on his website, in Mia Farrow’s house there was no attic, there was no trainset in the house and certainly not somewhere up in the ceiling, and hence it was impossible there could have been any abuse taking place there. And the day it was supposed to have happened the house was full of people, including Moses, who’d been told by Farrow to keep an eye on Allen because he’d started seeing Soon-Yi, and custody proceedings over Dylan had begun: Why would Woody Allen, who has never had any other accusations of impropriety, rape, child abuse, etc. at any point in his whole life, decide on THIS day, of ALL days, in a hostile setting, in the middle of a custody battle, surrounded by Farrow’s people, to suddenly go for broke and try his hand at a long, sustained bout of paedophilia?  Surely any reasonable person would have to conclude to do so, in an attic that didn’t exist, with a toy train set in his back pocket he decided to take out and lay down for the occasion, would be utter insanity.

    But of course he didn’t do any of this: this was all a fantasy planted into Dylan’s head by Farrow repeatedly telling her to say these things in order to get sole custody of the child, something that the Yale–New Haven Child Sexual Abuse Clinic whom the police hired to investigate the matter also concluded:

    “It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen. Further, we believe that Dylan’s statements on videotape and her statements to us during our evaluation do not refer to actual events that occurred to her on August 4, 1992.. In developing our opinion, we considered three hypotheses to explain Dylan’s statements. First, that Dylan’s statements were true and that Mr. Allen had sexually abused her; second, that Dylan’s statements were not true but were made up by an emotionally vulnerable child who was caught up in a disturbed family and who was responding to the stresses in the family; and third, that Dylan was coached or influenced by her mother, Ms. Farrow. While we can conclude that Dylan was not sexually abused, we cannot be definitive about whether the second formulation by itself or the third formulation by itself is true. We believe that it is more likely that a combination of these two formulations best explain Dylan’s allegations of sexual abuse.”

    anonymous

    Thank you for this blog, and thank you for putting some sense into all this craziness of sjws

    There’s a lot of craziness about.

    It’s nice to have a platform to say things that aren’t insane, since saying things that are insane is increasingly mandatory these days.

    feminismisahatemovement

    Just your daily reminder that Woody Allen was found to be innocent twice by two seperate law investigations and Mia Farrow is a psychotic monster who physically and psychologically abused all her children.

    feminismisahatemovement
    image

    No.

    His girlfriend Mia Farrow, who he never lived with or married, had adopted a houseful of kids from around the world with her previous husband before they met. While they were together, Allen never had a hand in raising those children, or even spent a single night in the house they lived in. When one of those kids, Soon-Yi, was 21 years old, they began spending more time together, fell in love, got married and are still happily married more than 25 years later.

    When Farrow found out he’d left her for this younger woman, she turned super, super, super-psycho and pulled out all the stops to get revenge, including coaching her 7-year old daughter (who towards the end of their relationship Allen had co-adopted) into telling a story that Allen had molested her. Two different police investigations into this concluded that the child had been coached by Farrow in order to get custody and that the allegations were unfounded, but the child still grew up hating her father and believing what her mother had brainwashed her into saying, along with her one biological child with Allen, Ronan, now a leader of the #MeToo movement.

    Both Soon-Yi and another of her children, Moses Farrow, have told of how Mia Farrow physically and psychologically abused all the children in her care - three of whom ended up dying young, two from suicide, one from AIDS.
    (
    Please read that link).

    Mia Farrow is a monster who, directly because of the #MeToo movement, gets to not only hide in plain sight, she gets to portray herself as a victim, a poor helpless woman who must be believed, even as she destroys the lives of all around her.

    someoneintheshadow456

    Wait… so it’s not Woody “daughter fucker” Allen…

    It’s Mia “crazy ex wife” Farrow…

    sashibunbun

    Yeah, that’s pretty much the truth. Woody kinda became the new MJ once MJ died, only it wasn’t because he was trying to recapture a lost childhood, but an age gap with a girl that Mia adopted AFTER her and Allen broke it off.

    r4cs0

    Oh wow

    nunyabizni

    This about covers it to the best of my knowledge, I try to avoid the whole discussion on here even being aware of the above stuff because it’s still tumblr and 2 consenting adults being a happy couple is still pedophilia if there is more than a 3.5 min difference in their age and I don’t need the fallout I might have gotten for defending someone that doesn’t need me to defend them.

    Woddy did adopt 2 of Mia’s other adopted children, but Soon-Yi wasn’t in the picture.

    Sash even got the Michael Jackson point in before I could, other than both situations being frowned on concurrently for a while.

    Woody’s quite a bit more reclusive than MJ ever was and regardless of how distasteful people may have found his relationship they were both adults, unlike the Jackson accusers, so it mellowed out for him for a while.

    Overall the whole thing has been a smear campaign and they seem to be a fairly functional couple without any major issues.

    Which isn’t allowed in Hollywood.

    Still comes off weird even with the context attached, but much less weird.

    brett-caton

    It does seem funny that the woman in question is now middle aged, and has lived quite happily in an adult relationship with Woody than most of us have with partners, and yet she still gets treated as a damsel who cannot be trusted to make her own choices.

    Just looked her up. She’s fifty. When does she get to be treated as an adult?

    The weird thing is, I always got the vibe that she was in charge.

    I can’t imagine wanting an older partner like that myself, but it is hardly unusual historically for women to seek men who have wealth and other assets, and Woody strikes me as an interesting guy.

    Here’s a link - apparently Mia went after Frank Sinatra with a similar age gap. Maybe Soon-Yi inherited that gene from her. 😁

    I have not checked all the claims but I do recall Mia saying she cheated on all her partners, especially Woody.

    “Allen described the last 5 years of his 13-year relationship with Farrow as ‘joyless, sexless,’ adding, 'Rightly or wrongly, I started this relationship with Soon-Yi.

    She was a grown person….I feel I fell in love with her, perhaps not wisely.’”

    If anything, it sounds like the 21 year old Soon-Yi seduced him. Which probably wasn’t hard, considering the relationship with Mia sounds like it was rotten by that time in any case.

    I think Mia had gotten everything she wanted out of Woody, and was with other men. Some women have come forward to say that she was sleeping with them too but it’s not proven.

    “Annie Hall”.

    I shall reveal my own bias. I grew up watching his early comedies, and slowly lost interest as he moved on, but I also read his books, which were entertaining and thoughtful.

    feminismisahatemovement

    Not sure why you were posting picture of Diane Keaton in Annie Hall but it’s a great movie.

    It’s weird how some people have been reblogging this post ignoring everything within it - especially Moses Farrow’s breakdown of why no paedophilia could have happened - and just going on with their #MeToo tar-and-feathering business as usual.

    It’s good to be reminded in the age of the internet that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And the accusations against Woody Allen are not only extraordinary but absolutely ridiculous.

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—President Donald Trump has been having trouble lately with one key demographic: suburban women. In a sure bet to win them over, Trump will be starring in his very own series of steamy romance novels.

    “If there’s one thing suburban women love,” Trump told the press, “it’s a steamy romance novel where women get to imagine themselves with a real winner instead of their loser husbands who remind them of Sleepy Joe.”

    In the first novel, Orange Passion, a woman is stolen away by dashing pirate Donald Trump into a bodice-ripping adventure. The first installment will be followed by other novels starring Trump in different time periods -- such as Trump as a cowboy and Trump as a duke -- though Trump has specified none will have sci-fi or fantasy elements, since “that’s for dorks.”

    “So now women are going to fantasize about me!” Trump added, “That's pretty usual for me. I’m used to it. But they’ll be able to make that fantasy a reality on Election Day.” Trump then winked and said, “Remember: The voting booth is private.”

    The Biden campaign says they’re not worried about Trump’s new tactics since Biden always likes to “sneak up on women from behind” anyway.

    feminismisahatemovement

    That pregnancy post is satire, but there's a minority of trans "men" getting pregnant and giving birth... No man would willingly do that. They claim they're male and need hormones and surgeries, but are ok with pregnancy which is female. And if you call it out you get attacked because it's okay to make actual transexual men into a joke.

    It does seem a little odd.

    chimaera-bones

    While it’s not something that I understand or would ever pursue myself, it seems pretty pointless to judge transmen for doing traditional female things such as wanting to be pregnant, since none of us will ever be male no matter what we do (or don’t do).

    The only thing that really concerns me about it is the possible long-term effects on the unborn child. From what I’ve heard, testosterone shots are supposed to be put on hold during gestation, but obviously there’s going to be a difference between an unaltered set of female reproductive organs and one that’s had long-term exposure to male hormones. As far as I know, there haven’t been any issues so far, but I think more medical research needs to be done.

    fanfictionqueen90

    I've always wondered about the effects of hormone therapy on babies born from trans people myself. I've never brought it up because I don't know a great deal of trans people personally.

    feminismisahatemovement

    Me too.

    I’ve also pondered a lot on the effects of humanity interfering for the first time the past century in the hormonal balance of their own species, starting with things like giving pregnant women both additional male and female hormone shots for morning sickness, etc., back in the 1950s, and the introduction of the birth control pill (artificially boosting estrogen) in the 60s. I can’t help but think this tampering with the chemical soup of our being might not be a factor in the rise of the number of people coming forth saying they are feeling they are born in the wrong body today.

    I’m not scientifically minded in any way, but it seems to me a fairly obvious thing to be concerned about, so I would hope someone in a lab coat is looking into this somewhere.

    anonymous

    That pregnancy post is satire, but there's a minority of trans "men" getting pregnant and giving birth... No man would willingly do that. They claim they're male and need hormones and surgeries, but are ok with pregnancy which is female. And if you call it out you get attacked because it's okay to make actual transexual men into a joke.

    It does seem a little odd.

    feminismisahatemovement

    Just your daily reminder that Woody Allen was found to be innocent twice by two seperate law investigations and Mia Farrow is a psychotic monster who physically and psychologically abused all her children.

    feminismisahatemovement
    image

    No.

    His girlfriend Mia Farrow, who he never lived with or married, had adopted a houseful of kids from around the world with her previous husband before they met. While they were together, Allen never had a hand in raising those children, or even spent a single night in the house they lived in. When one of those kids, Soon-Yi, was 21 years old, they began spending more time together, fell in love, got married and are still happily married more than 25 years later.

    When Farrow found out he’d left her for this younger woman, she turned super, super, super-psycho and pulled out all the stops to get revenge, including coaching her 7-year old daughter (who towards the end of their relationship Allen had co-adopted) into telling a story that Allen had molested her. Two different police investigations into this concluded that the child had been coached by Farrow in order to get custody and that the allegations were unfounded, but the child still grew up hating her father and believing what her mother had brainwashed her into saying, along with her one biological child with Allen, Ronan, now a leader of the #MeToo movement.

    Both Soon-Yi and another of her children, Moses Farrow, have told of how Mia Farrow physically and psychologically abused all the children in her care - three of whom ended up dying young, two from suicide, one from AIDS.
    (
    Please read that link).

    Mia Farrow is a monster who, directly because of the #MeToo movement, gets to not only hide in plain sight, she gets to portray herself as a victim, a poor helpless woman who must be believed, even as she destroys the lives of all around her.